Awaiting reviewer scores how long reddit As for user reviews, people are more likely to write a review for a game they didn't enjoy then one they liked, and you don't know how long they played it for or how much it was influenced by external factors such as overhype, politics etc. Submitted a request for review, denied again. View. Its been 10 days now but not yet single confirmation mail. For the others, you need to wait for your result to arrive, and then use the function to send additionals, which may take up to 5 Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Improve this question. This change has "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. What is meant by ''Awaiting AE evaluation''? I submitted a paper to the journal. " Reddit. Thank you for letting me know. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. . The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". The best place on Reddit for LSAT advice. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is The #1 social media platform for MCAT advice. If you hover over the "Awaiting Review" you will see the date the study is to be approved by. Most recent answer. What should I do? General Advice I sent my ETS TOEFL official score report on 25th November and submitted my graduate school application on 9th December. After then i was waiting for final confirmation mail / certification from google cloud. The paper received an R&R last summer and a revised version was provided. I submitted a paper to some journal. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". I had to explain what a CUE was to here. Then I'll have a coffee/wait a day and think it over. If you have some names of suggested reviewers, there is no harm in reaching out to the journal to let them know. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. Once the completed reviews come in, the Associate Editor (AE) evaluates them and gives his recommendation to the EiC. I got an automated message earlier saying It’s been 1 business days and they’re still reviewing everything. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Get help with your research. I have previously published in the same journal I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Reddit. Reddit. ’ It's been a month since the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Staff will never review your order quicker simply because you request they do so. Soliciting of any kind will not be tolerated. 21 3 3 bronze badges. Reasonable, but the one-round reviewing process is a bummer sometimes. If you’re not awaiting a test score, ACT says If the score is available to be sent, it is usually sent the same day. If you wait too long, it'll pile up and you'll be drowning in reviews to do. Have been denied at the end of November. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 0. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? How Long til a Reviewer is Assigned? My apps (Primary and secondary) at 11 MD schools have been completed and paid for for nearly a month now. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). If your manuscript is at this stage, then enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just need to wait for the reviewers to return their comments so that a decision can be taken. Doesn't show on the va app, but noticed it says updated march 14th, today. To me, it seems like this would be fairly efficient/reproducible once you have it setup? Reddit. a90. The official student-made subreddit of the Ateneo de Manila University. Still shows in the evidence, gathering review phase. But the editor, for some reason, e. Check out the sidebar for intro guides. Alaska scores come out on May 5th at some point. At this point, I’d feel comfortable sending a I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). Since the application process itself is often nothing short of herculean and time-consuming to boot, this place is meant to serve as a talking ground to answer questions, better improve applications, and increase one's chance of being 'Referred'. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. That always slows everything down in state work. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. Could anyone kindly tell me how long should I wait to get the score? Is it like step1 and step2ck on the 3rd wednesday after our exam? Kindly help From what I know, the unis you select when you take the test (up to 4) receive it as soon as you do. This subreddit is for all those interested in working for the United States federal government. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status TOEFL score report status is still "Awaiting" even though my TOEFL score report status was processed on August 13th . Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". This journal only has one editor (with a grad student working as a managing editor). So if that’s the average and one was accepted in 10 days, how long should you now wait for the second? – Solar Mike. You can then click on the "Review Item" button to either review the item or Awaiting Screening Results (Taking Longer than Expected) Hi all--I completed all required paper work and took my drug test on 11/9, but am still awaiting results. It's 2016. Here is the copypasta for people with score delays and tight deadlines: Before you do anything, contact your target schools and tell them you might have a delay, re: TOEFL scores. From local news and events to breathtaking scenery and outdoor activities, this community is a hub for British Columbians and anyone interested in The HLR reviewer said my back issue was more that a year ago and there is nothing she can do. To the students. How long I should wait for the final verdict? My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. Does it really take this long to find reviewers? angelachan001 • "Awaiting Reader Selection" But some people say "Awaiting Reader Selection" is different from " "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". I didnt see the "under review After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". /r/MCAT is a place for MCAT practice, questions, discussion, advice, social networking, news, study tips and more. When I checked the link on the 16th of April, I saw that the status has changed from "Under Review" to "Review Complete" with the status date 16th of April with the following stats: It’s possible that scoring the exam involves more than just scoring and that’s why results take so long. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 5 given by the reviewers in ACL rolling review represent? I heard that if I want to respond to the reviews then I have to make a resubmission. Extended Long Short-Term Memory Wᴇʟᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. So I ask how a paper takes long time like that for the review process and usually the editors when they invite a reviewer, they ask him to finish the review process within 3 weeks. It may take minimum of 6 months to complete the double blind peer review and later it totally depends upon the editor and author communication. Most recent answer (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Our Opinion. Been a reviewer for a couple weeks now, but I never really got any guidance as to how long the feedback should be. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week Hey everyone, how long do submissions usually take to get approved? I have always got them back in 24 hours but now I have 3 submissions "awaiting review" - two from 3 days ago and one from 2 days ago. Today the status was updated to Awaiting Decision. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. What it means? Reddit. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. The reader may still be an admin staffer who conducts editorial screening before passing it to the editor. a. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. Is anyone in the same boat? Is this normal for UCLA? My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Disclaimer: Please note the information provided by our members is not (and should not) be interpreted as legal advice. We also have a few related resources on submission statuses, including a useful handbook curated by Otherwise, it doesn't really matter how long you take to do a review. I think if you request through ETS and put the correct department code, they should get it and update status automatically. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? if one of the original reviewers was generally happy with your revisions and recommended acceptance (or minor revisions), but the • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Q: How long does "Pending Review" take? A: Always under 24 hours. Add a comment | 1 Answer Sorted by: Reset to default 0 "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. I think there needs to be a certain criteria for the rating system that way it’s unbiased and reviewers aren’t getting completely different scores on tasks. This seems like a long time to wait for the editorial decision. As it states (emphasis ours): Note: If you are uploading a copy of your transcript(s), additional PDF Documents or requested an official copy I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . I sent the scores long back. Even he couldn't understand why I was denied when I had paperwork documenting my injuries and disabilities well within the first 12 months of getting discharged. My first round was from 2012 to 2020 to get everything sorted out from the veterans law judge. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. You should expect to receive the final decision from the handling editor soon. So you’re looking at about 58 days on the low end of just not ordering or reviewing anything to Application status "awaiting materials" due to TOEFL. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary Reddit. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, A forum to discuss the SAT and forms of preparation for taking the test. We then double check all the scoring and totals adds up before bulk uploading and releasing to candidates. Post any questions you have, there are lots of Where do you find a reviewer’s R-Score? The R-Score can be found in the reviewer search results, or by clicking on the spyglass icon next to a reviewer’s name. Surprisingly, reviewers who stated that they "I do not know much about this area" or "I made a quick assessment of this paper" were less likely to change their score. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Sometimes longer. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Remember that the same people that are madly trying to get things straightened out for people starting this semester would be the ones who have to load the scores and answer questions, so maybe Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. There may be multiple departments/program areas involved in disseminating the scores. Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. I had my certification for 10 years before I bothered looking up my score. What does this mean? Asked on 06 Oct, 2021 You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. I sent extra active duty medical r/BritishColumbia is dedicated to all things related to the Canadian province of British Columbia, situated on the stunning West Coast. 10/10 and 0/10 reviews are equally useless to me as it never feels like the person actually thought about Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. But alas, we are on day 12 of waiting for scores to be sent and the November 1st deadline for EA and Merrit Scholarships is approaching fast. Most recent answer I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". Everything is electronic. But still the status of my toefl score report is awaiting. The fact that you are apparently seeing this status for more than a brief moment indicates that the journal is using Rearrangements/delays to interviews happen, but awaiting results means just that. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. Scores for each reviewer do not "average" into the final impact score assigned by the study section, so if your 2. Edit: you will only receive an email when the editor makes a decision based on the reviews and will communicate the final result. Or check it out in the app stores   I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. g. Still the status is same. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. Then she stated I can’t have a separate MH and TBI rating and that one would have to be severed. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". They ALL still say awaiting to be assigned a reviewer or ready for review. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:02. Their Wording. So 10-15 days for you and them. a90 m. called several times to get clarification as to why I was being denied assistance and each time, I get a different response from the " case managers' in reality it is any rep that answers the phone when you call. But the actual scale range can Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Or check it out in the app stores how long roughly have people waited to find out and were you successful? two positions to fill will stay like that until the results have been checked by an independent checker to ensure the scoring has followed fair and open competition Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. But in all seriousness, long delays are the norm for journals now. What does awaiting reviewers reply mean? And how long does it take. Here is the exact verbiage on the Application Checklist. View My paper in that journal about 1 month is on "Awaiting Recommendations". Scores: 7 4 7 4 5 -> 8 4 8 6 6 :) Paper 2: Scores: 8 2 7 -> 4 4 5 The reject only happened because they couldn't do a second round of reviewing to verify my proposed generalizations. Share your experiences, insights, and let's keep the discussion flowing! To kick things off, here are my scores and confidence levels: Paper 1: 4 (4) 4 (5) 2 (3) Did my biometric on the 2nd of March at Vienna TLS for the Standard Visitor visa. 0. 3 months is too long. Today, I received an email from LiverpoolVisaInfo stating that my application has arrived at the UKVI Decision Making Centre and is now awaiting consideration. Is it possible to be Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The reddit for students of Concordia It says 4-5 business days. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! If Posted by u/[Deleted Account] - 4 votes and 103 comments Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory Reviews completed --> self-explanatory With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the Amazon Vine is a small invite-only group of prestigious product reviewers. Reddit comments are not legal advice and do not replace consulting a qualified, licensed immigration Reddit. "You have a maximum of 21 days to review submissions. I'm just waiting. The reviews came back fairly quickly, and for the past 4-5 weeks the paper is showing that it is awaiting the final decision. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Sounds like it is out for review. Seeing other reviewers' effort, even in high impact journals, it often seems I'm more thorough than the average. Most of the time if you do contact ETS they will just tell you to keep on waiting. Others take their time. The EiC gives the final verdict based on Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. I have a paper that was under review with one of Wiley's journals. If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. All in all, a little less than a day's work. ’ It is a After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. Any idea how long they'll take to send the decision? The Reddit Law School Admissions Forum. How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to the It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. We do not require AEs to give each review a score, but the more ratings we receive, the more helpful the score Reddit. Post any questions you have, there are lots of redditors with admissions knowledge waiting to help. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. 79% of all reviews changed their score (mostly improvements). But the program can view all the students scores prior to student release, and can give a student their score report prior to release, if needed. The MCAT (Medical College Admission Test) is offered by the AAMC and is a required exam for admission to medical schools in the USA and Canada. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". You said you recommended rejection twice now, and somewhat harshly because you perceived fatal flaws (that I assume you don't believe can be addressed in a revision). The Reddit LSAT Forum. All you need is the past fail certification, not the score. I have even emailed them, but no reply. Does anyone have an idea how long does it take to be decided normally? Amazon Vine is a small invite-only group of prestigious product reviewers. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments I am a statistician and the journal will specify they are requesting me to review statistical methods in which case I will spend ideally upto 4 hours reviewing (may not be in one seating) but if it is paper relevant to my field I will review both the overall content and the methods which will obviously take longer. Although you should avoid it, sometimes large PRs happen, and reviewing them is a lot of work - it might be unreasonable to expect reviews for such PRs during the same day. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. In our very humble (and very non-official) opinion, the statuses and dates on the Application Checklist are confusing at best and misleading at worst. She didn’t say anything about the sleep apnea. Follow asked Mar 29, 2018 at 6:38. But they have Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. They're always too long and quite detailed. It is possible than 1-2 reviewers, or 1-2 review categories scored poorly, which dragged your whole app into the bottom half. Contact the official pages/offices related to your concerns for more concrete answers. PDF reports are available two days after you take the test. /r/immigration is protesting Reddit's API changes. If you haven't reviewed submissions after 21 days, our system will automatically approve all submissions that are awaiting review. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. In particular, I was interested in how the scores were affected by the discussions. I don’t have an exact amount of time for how long it takes to get put in vine jail but I would have to assume not reviewing or ordering for 30 days. It's not a hard mark to hit. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). I’ve requested a new reviewer bc of the lies she told me As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the I submitted it toward the end of May, and recently it’s changed from saying “under peer review” to “awaiting reviewer scores. I know that the bar began contacting my former employers a couple of weeks ago I requested the scores to be sent to Georgia Tech at the time of registration for the exam. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. Is this normal or am I missing something? Thanks in advance everyone! Scores and Quality Ranking. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Awaiting Reviewer Scores This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. Typically, a higher score indicates a higher quality sample. READ THE RULES BEFORE POSTING USMLE Step 2 CK is the second national board exam all United States medical students must take before graduating medical school. From your experience if a tenant was going to be denied for whatever reason would this information be communicated pretty early in the process? The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. I have an article I submitted to a journal a little over 2 months ago. It takes as long as it takes. The EiC at that time said they'll look It is difficult to estimate how much longer you need to wait. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Hi everyone. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". The Reviews page will give you a choice of two tabs: "Awaiting Review" (this is what you will see by default) or "Reviewed". It means several reviewers have been invited. Usually mine ranges from 150-500 words, but can sometimes be only a sentence or two if the task doesn’t have any errors, or up to 600 words if there are a ton of errors to address and work that can be done. The best place on Reddit for admissions advice. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. But I have things more than month old just waiting for the review. Is this a long time to wait for the scores? Should I communicate with the editor, or is this a bad sign? I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Please use this subreddit to ask for and offer help and to discuss both the exam itself and news about the exam. How does JID Journals use the R-Score? We only rate reviews on quality. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. At its heart, reviewer scoring is simply a way to rank the relative quality of all the products a given reviewer has sampled. I feel many reviewers see one or two issues and instantly want to mark a low score . If at least two accept you should hear soon. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. If you hang out the ptcb website they should be able to print you out a certificate of completion and the score does not matter. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) It probably varies a lot by field etc but I’ve never had a paper take more than a few weeks to get to reviewers (except one case, where an assigned reviewer got sick, or something, and the editor needed to find an alternate). It looks like the editor has asked a number of reviewers, but none have accepted as yet. - - - Disclaimer: r/admu cannot provide official answers to inquiries about admissions, shifting, etc. email the editor or editorial office. " This status has not been changed for a month. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Students can access their score reports on the PAEA website, but faculty/clinical director have to “release” the scores — that’s just the terminology PAEA uses. Finally I read it through while writing my review. I saw they received and stated reviewing on Dec 3rd. The Reddit Law School Admissions Forum. publications; Share. So, please give me However, the status of my revised manuscript is showing "awaiting reviewer scores" again. It totally depends upon the reviewers and editor. Today it went Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. For the love of all that is good and holy, I can not comprehend any reason why sending SAT scores electronically to Colleges takes more than a few seconds. I'm in the pending final review phase as of today. I was recently “promoted “to reviewer and the rating skill is ridiculous. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. This is basically a new service where you can see how many reviewers were invited, how many accepted the invitations, and how many have completed the review. The EiC at that time said they'll look Waiting exactly a year now in NY. Join ResearchGate to ask questions, get input, and advance your work. After 22 days, the submission is automatically approved. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? If your scores are specifically listed as "on hold" that means they must be confirmed by ETS. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Reddit. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is Some set up automatic approval so it is approved as soon as you submit the study. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. how long it will take them to give a review. Just waiting for the reviewer to to complete their review so it can go to PFD. 8 is the average from the reviewers that actually means very little. Pinging (@mentioning) staff to request they review your order(s) may result in a ban or kick from this server. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Email them to ask if they've received your scores from ETS, tell them what institution code you've used. I contacted Amazon and was told my background check went through but they are still waiting for my drug test results to come back. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. Top contributors to discussions in this field (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is Reddit. The panels need to collate/score/dip test a few others if there’s multiple panels and return to HR. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Scores are sent to universities a few days after About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. ” How long does it typically say that for before you get your results?? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Now it is almost 3 weeks. After you have checked your participants’ submissions, you should pay them as soon as possible. That can take 2-4 weeks. Just don't get below 50% or you'll be suspended until your reviews are caught up above 50%. Then I'll reread more in-depth. The page mentions that it takes upto 5 business days to match scores, but it has been way past 5 days. The college I applied to requires SAT Scores, with optional Subject Test scores, so on college board I sent the Auto-score-report for The actual SAT (March), my SAT with Essay (October '17), and my Subject Tests, which I took on November 3rd of this year. In summary, 11. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. It’s getting really hard to find reviewers. Q: How long should the 'Awaiting EIC Decision' last before a final decision? Detailed Question - After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. I think it'll take awhile bc my supplemental claim was for 5 condition that was denied due to lack of evidence that it was service connected. As the reviewers' scores for CVPR 2024 are out, I thought it would be good to open up a thread for discussions and questions regarding the review process and rebuttals. Depending on when your order is placed, you may have to wait no longer than 10 minutes. You might be able to work something out with them. One tweak I would make - in your master sheet, it looks like there may be a column for each reviewer? If so, it may be simpler to condense this into 4 columns - Reviewer 1 Name, Reviewer 1 Score, Reviewer 2 Name, Reviewer 2 Score. Post any questions you have, there are lots of The Reddit LSAT Forum. Oh OK. Researchers have 21 days to approve submissions. If you do not get a satisfactory response, pull it A place to discuss US and Worldwide immigration news, politics, visas, green cards, raids, deportations, etc. Initially, the status was ''Awaiting Reviewer Scores'', then changed to ''Awaiting AE Recommendation'', and now it is ''Awaiting AE evaluation''. I applied to the UCLA MS in CS program and submitted my application on 12th December. The lack of notice from Reddit, exorbitant pricing and terrible official apps are unacceptable. The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". What could be What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar, 2020 Resources for authors and journals Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are currently waiting for the final reviewer's comments and will reach out as soon as a decision has been reached. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Journals vary in how long they "give" reviewers, usually 10 days at shortest to 3 weeks being average (at least in my field), to the rare 3 months. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. This subreddit is only for those who have been invited by Amazon. I have taken exam on May 13, 2020. Even in this case, the reviewer must still respond to the request, to let the reviewee know approx. What does a score of 2. A subreddit to ask questions (and get answers) about Reddit Tech Support. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. m. Posted by u/klrich - 1 vote and 13 comments The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Amazon Vine is a small invite-only group of prestigious product reviewers. The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) is the test required to get into an ABA law school. bbjy ydwlkk ysjza wwu wlofsfn mgverz ojpb xmv nsbuz dhr